DOI: 10.17721/2521-1706.2020.10.3

Tetiana Klynina

Ph.D. (History), Associate professor, National aviation university, Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID: 0000-0002-0334-9852


The article is devoted to the analysis of the formation of the legal framework that made possible the existence and functioning of the US foreign service.

The purpose of the article is to clarify the preface and the course of formation of the professional foreign service of the United States, which was reflected in the adoption of the Rogers Act.

The methodological basis of the study. The study was based on the principle of historicism, which contributed to the consideration of the phenomenon under study in its development and made it possible to identify periods in the formation of a professional diplomatic service. The use of the problem-chronological method contributed to the preservation of the historical heredity and integrity of the picture; the application of the comparative method made it possible to identify significant changes that occurred after the adoption of Rogers’ Law, which was considered through the use of the method of analysis. A historiographical description of the main scientific works devoted to the research topic is given. Analyzed works A. Evans, T. Lay, I. Stewart etc., which became the basis for the study.

The scientific novelty lies in the systematization of ideas about qualitative and quantitative changes in the diplomatic service after the adoption of the relevant law. The author concludes that before the adoption of the Rogers Act there was no control over the selection of diplomatic and consular staff and the negative consequences of such a decision were especially evident during the First World War. Therefore, the historical conditions in which America found itself at that time became a challenge for the continued existence of the consular and diplomatic services, and therefore the issue of restructuring and modernization of these services in the United States and its transfer to another, qualitatively new level.

In general, the author emphasizes the change in the status of foreign service, which was introduced by relevant legislation, namely the Rogers Act, the need for which was caused by certain historical conditions of the American state and its place on the world stage. Prior to the enactment of the Diplomatic Service Act, there was virtually no control over the selection of diplomatic and consular personnel representing the United States on the world stage. After the First World War, it became clear that the diplomatic service needed to be restructured. That is why Rogers’ law was passed, which, in fact, was the first legislative attempt to resolve this issue.

Key words: USA, State Department, Foreign Service, Rogers Law, J. Rogers, W. Carr.

Full text:


1. Matveev, V. N. (1987). USA diplomatic service. Мoscow: International relation [In Russian].

2. Department of State Personalities of Note (n. d.). USA Department of State.

3. Evans, A. E. (1948). The Reorganization of the American Foreign Service. International Affairs, 24(2), 206-217. DOI: 10.2307/3017973 

4. In the Beginning: The Rogers Act of 1924 (n. d.). American Foreign Service Association.

5. JustesenR. African-American Consuls Abroad, 1897–1909 (n. d.).  Documen.

6. Lay, T. (1924). Foreign Service Reorganization. The American Political Science Review, 18(4), 697-711. DOI: 10.2307/1943667

7. MacClintock, S. (1922). A Unified Foreign Service. The American Political Science Review, 16(4), 600-611. DOI: 10.2307/1943640

8. Stewart, I. (1930). Congress, the Foreign Service, and the Department of State. American Political Science Review, 24(02), 355-366. DOI: 10.2307/1946654 

9. Reed, T. L. (1978). Organizational Change in the American Foreign Service, 1925–1965: The Utility of Cohort Analysis. American Sociological Review, 43(3), 404415. DOI: 10.2307/2094498

10. The Rogers Act (n. d.). Office of the Historians.

11. Wood, M. W. (2013). Lucile Atcherson Curtis: The First Female American Diplomat. Foreign Service Journal, JulyAugust 2013, 23-27.