PhD (History), associate professor, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine.
The Mediterranean Sea is an important geopolitical region which defines the economic and strategic interests of the world powers, including the USA. The author`s vision of the US Mediterranean policy and its periodization was presented in the article.
Research objective: the paper is devoted to the problem of the US Mediterranean policy in the 19th century. The purpose of the presented study is to research origin and development of the US Mediterranean policy taking into account the context of the European and world historical processes.
Scientific novelty: the innovative nature of the article lies in the revision of the approach to the US Mediterranean policy`s timeline. The author`s periodization of the US Mediterranean policy was presented in the research. A special attention was focused on the US economic and geopolitical interests` transformations at each stage.
Research methods. The history and genetic method was used in the article. It helps to research the origins of the US Mediterranean policy and to separate this policy into self-contained stages. Author`s periodization of the US Mediterranean policy became practical results of the mentioned method. The author demonstrated connections between all stages as holistic process of the American foreign policy`s evolution. An accent is done on research of geopolitical and economic interests of the USA in the field of the system analysis. That allows to consider connection between American foreign policy and European and world historical processes. The influence of the Concert of Europe and the Doctrine of Monroe on the US Mediterranean policy was taken into account also.
Conclusions. In contradiction with widespread vision of the US Mediterranean policy in the 19th century as an unseparated historical period, it is possible to defined three stages. The first period (1776–1823) represented the early vision of the American state`s economic interests. The US Mediterranean policy until 1823 was characterized by intensive commercial, political and military activity in the region. The first military conflict in the history of the USA as an independent state was connected with the trade routes and security of navigation in the Mediterranean Sea. The second period (1823–1898) was characterized by principles of the Monroe Doctrine. During the period of isolationism, the USA maintained diplomatic and economic ties with the Mediterranean countries. A main aspect of the US Mediterranean policy at the mention period consisted of the humanitarian and commercial efforts in the Northern Africa and The Middle East. The third period (1898–1914) showed a gradually revision of the Monroe Doctrine. The transformation of the American political course was observed after the Spanish war and in the eve of the First World War. It was concluded that the Mediterranean policy of the USA in 19th century had an evolutional character and corresponded with inclusive European and American policy. Each of the mentioned stages represented an important period of history of the American diplomacy and foreign policy, that is why a research has a prospect for a future survey.
Key words: First Barbary War, Monroe Doctrine, American university of Beirut, Spanish-American war.
1. Gonchar, B. M. (1974). Sredizemnomorskaya politika SSHA (1968–1973): avtoref. dis. na soiskaniye stepeni kand. ist. nauk. Kyiv. [In Russian].
2. Humenyuk, B. I., Koppel’, O. A. (2001). Mizhnarodni vidnosyny n Blyz’komu ta Seredn’omu Skhodi: Mizhnarodni vidnosyny ta zovnishnya polityka. 1980–2000. Кyiv. [In Ukrainian].
3. Mashevs’kyy, O. (2016). Polityka SSHA u chornomors’ko-seredzemnomorsʹkomu rehioni v period Pershoyi svitovoyi viyny: Amerykans’ka polityka ta istoriya, 2, 118–127. [In Ukrainian].
4. Mekhen, A. (2002). Vliyaniye morskoy sily na istoriyu 1660–1783. SPb.: Terra Fantastica. [In Russian].
5. Al Sarhan, A.S. (2017). United States Foreign Policy and the Middle East. Open Journal of Political Science, 7, 454–472. [In English].
6. Joshua, E. Z. (2006). London Victory in Tripoli: Lessons for the War on Terrorism. https://web.archive.org/web/20060515222634/http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/hl940.cfm [In English].
7. Lenczowski, G. (1980). The Middle East in World Affairs. New York: Cornell University Press [In English].
8. Passage of War Ships Through Suez Canal. (Mr.Hay to Mr.Day). June 25, 1898 (1901). Foreign Relations of the United States, Washington: Government Printed Office. [In English].
9. Wells, S.B. (1987). Long-time friends: Early U.S. –Moroccan Relations 1777-1787. Department of State Bulletin, 87 (September), 1–15. [In English].