DOI: 10.17721/2521-1706.2019.07.7-16 

Tetiana Klynina

PhD (History), Associate professor,  Нistory and  documentation department, National Aviation University, Kyiv

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of the activities of the American consul of the United States of America in the years of the existence of the Ukrainian National Republic, and also provides a historiographical analysis of works devoted to this problem (in particular, the works of I. Matyash, I. Datskiv, A. Pavlyuk, etc.). The author notes that with the proclamation by the Central Rada of the Third universal, which created the Ukrainian National Republic, the Ukrainian Central Rada was faced with the task of establishing external relations with various countries, including the United States of America. However, before the outbreak of World War I, the concept of “Ukrainian question” and “Ukraine” was “terra incognita” for Washington, which was primarily explained by the isolationist policies of the American government.

In its foreign policy, the United States has traditionally been guided by the idea of ​​federalism in questions about the approaches of the state system. The United States did not pursue a separate course towards Ukraine. Washington viewed it as a component of its policy towards Russia. In the US attitude toward the Ukrainian National Republic, the reluctance to complicate the political choice for America was outweighed. There was fear that an inaccurately chosen priority would lead to an unwelcome conflict with Russia. It is stated that as the United States did not carry out a separate course towards Ukraine, so the leaders of the Central Rada did not develop a clear position towards the United States. However, the situation that developed at the end of 1917 made the American diplomatic community “look” at the situation in Ukraine. That is why the American consul Douglas Jenkins was sent to “assess” the capabilities of the young state. Douglas Jenkins had clear instructions from the ambassador to do nothing, in the absence of a further word from Washington that could be interpreted as recognition of the Ukrainian Council.

Particular attention is paid to the analysis of his seven reports, which the consul sent to the US State Department through the Consulate General in Moscow, and which is an important source in understanding the Ukrainian situation in late 1917 – early 1918.

Keywords: UNR foreign policy, American consul, United States, Douglas Jenkins, diplomacy, revolution 1917 – 1921.

Full text

References:

  1. Datskiv, B. (2009). Diplomacy of Ukrainian state entities in the protection of national interests 1917-1923. Ternopol: Aston.
  2. Datskiv, B. (2008). Diplomatic orientations of the Ukrainian Central Rada on the Entente: achievements and losses in Kievan antiquity, 6, 38 – 48.
  3. Dodd, W. (2017).  Ambassador Dodd’s diary. Moscow: Litres.
  4. Kuchik, O. (2004). Ukraine in the Foreign Policy of the Entente States (1917-1920). Lviv: LNU Publishing Center. I. Franko.
  5. Matvienko, (2002). Ukrainian diplomacy 1917-1921: in the post-imperial Russia. Kyiv: VPC Kiev University.
  6. Matyash, I. (2017). “Foreign Consuls in the USSR (1919-1922)”. In International relations of Ukraine: scientific searches and finds. Retrieved from http://resource.history.org.ua/publ/Mzu
  7. Matyash, I. (2015). The fate of Yevhen Slabchenko’s diplomatic archive. Ukrayina diplomatichna in Ukraine is diplomatic, 16, 715 – 731.
  8. Matyash, I.B. (2016). Advocacy group of the US Consulate General in Kiev: tasks and forms of activity in American history and politics, 1, 79-86.
  9. Matyash, I. (2016). Ukrainian Consular Service 1917-1923 as a state institute: formation, functioning, personalities. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine.
  10. Matyash, I. (2019). Foreign missions in Ukraine (1917-1919): State mission and everyday life. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine.
  11. Pavlyuk, V. (1996). Ukraine’s Fight for Independence and US Politics (1917-1923). Kyiv: KM Academia.
  12. Slabchenko E., (2015). Diplomatic History of Ukraine Matyash (Ed.). Kyiv: KLIO.
  13. Solovyova,V. V. (2006). Diplomatic activity of the Ukrainian national governments 1917-1921. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine NAS of Ukraine.
  14. Sukhobokova O. (2018) In the struggle for independence of Ukraine: Ukrainian diaspora of the USA during the First World War. Retrieved August 20, 2019, from http://vidia.ua/2018/70568
  15. Shamraeva, V.M. (2013). The emergence of the Ukrainian issue in the US foreign policy doctrine in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Visnik Dnipropetrovskogo universitetu in Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University. V.20, 23 (3), 246 – 251.
  16. Dergachov, O. (Ed.). (1996) Ukrainian Statehood in the Twentieth Century: An Historical and Political Analysis. Retrieved from http://litopys.org.ua/ukrxx/r14.htm
  17. What is the Ukrainian Revolution? (2019). Retrieved http://history.franko.lviv.ua/gryc_r3.htm
  18. Fedynsky, A. (1997). Ukraine’s historic opportunity. The Ukrainian Weekly, 8, LXV. Retrieved August 15, 2019 from http://www.ukrweekly.com/old/archive/1997/089716.shtml.
  19. Foreign Relation of the United States. (1918). Washington, V. II, 648 – 706.
  20. Kennan, G. F. (1956). Russia leaves the war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  21. Laserson, M. M. (1950). The American impact on Russia: diplomatic and ideological, 1784-1917. New York: Macmillan.
  22. Margolin, A. D. (1946). From a political diary: Russia, the Ukraine, and America, 1905-1945. New York: Columbia University Press.