PhD in Political Science, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine
The article deals with the European aspects of the US foreign policy in the 2nd half of the 20th century. It also includes studies of the transatlantic relations of the described period and the exploration of an American influence on European integration processes.
It is determined that the United States has demonstrated itself as a partner of the Western governments in the post-war reconstruction and further creation of an area of US security and prosperity. At the same time, it is noted that the American presidents have differently shaped their administrations’ policies towards Europe. The greatest supporter of the European integration processes was President Eisenhower. Among other things, the US President believed that Europe would become a key ally of the United States, thus, he considered the union of Sweden, Greece, Spain and Yugoslavia as a solid foundation for building a “United States of Europe”.
After Eisenhower administration, European affairs, to a lesser extent, were taken up by such Presidents as Johnson, Carter, Reagan and Clinton. Showing no personal interest, Kennedy, Nixon and Bush-Sr. were forced to support the transatlantic dialogue, understanding the inevitability of European integration and the need for the United States to cooperate with the new consolidated actor.
The United States aimed to strengthen its position in the European space, moving to that purpose by using NATO mechanisms and applying the policies of American protectionism against the communist threat. The main competitor of the United States for strengthening national positions in Europe was France led by General de Gaulle, who believed that the affairs of Europe should be resolved by European governments without the American intervention. However, NATO continued to serve as a springboard for the U.S. involvement in European affairs. At the end of the 20th century, through the close links between the EU and NATO, the USA received new allies from Central and Eastern European countries. It is concluded that after the end of World War II, Europe needed an assistance that the United States willingly provided in exchange for the ability to participate in European issues, solving and partly controlling the integration processes.
The study found that, despite the varying degree of the American interest in transatlantic affairs, Europe has consistently been remaining a zone of national interest for the United States.
Key words: USA; Europe; NATO; European integration; transatlantic relations.
- Lakishyk, D. M. (2014). Amerykano-Ievropeiski vidnosyny periodu prezydentstva Dzh. Busha-molodshoho. Naukovyi visnyk Dyplomatychnoi akademii Ukrainy, 18, 125–130. [In Ukrainian].
- Myronova, M. (2007). Transformatsiia vidnosyn Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu ta SShA v postbipoliarnyi period (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Kyivskyi Natsionalnyi Universytet im. Tarasa Shevchenka, Instytut Mizhnarodnykh Vidnosyn, Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
- Ratnikov, M. I. (2013). Yevropeiska polityka SShA v konteksti politychnykh transformatsii u YeS (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Natsionalna Akademiia Nauk Ukrainy, Instytut Svitovoi Ekonomiky i Mizhnarodnykh Vidnosyn, Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
- Khudolii, A. O. (2013). Publichnyi dyskurs u zovnishnopolitychnii diialnosti prezydentiv SShA (1945–2012 rr.) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Natsionalnyi universytet «Ostrozka akademiia», Ostroh. [In Ukrainian].
- Ambrose, S. E. (2014). Eisenhower: Soldier and President. New York, N.Y.: Simon and Schuster. [In English].
- Auten, B. (2008). Carter’s conversion: The hardening of American defense policy. Columbia: University of Missouri Press. [In English].
- Clinton, (n.d.) Remarks to multinational audience of future leaders of Europe. (Brussels, 9 January 1994). U.S. Diplomatic Mission to Germany, http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga6-940109.htm [In English].
- Cohen, W. I. (1995). The Cambridge history of American foreign relations: Volume 4, America in the age of Soviet power, 1945–1991. Cambridge: University Press. [In English].
- Colucci, (2012). The National Security Doctrines of the American presidency: How they shape our present and future. Volume 2. California: ABC-CLIO. [In English].
- (n.d.). Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance issued by the heads of state and government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council («The London Declaration») (London, 6 July 1990), http://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/the_london_declaration_on_a_transformed_north_atlantic_alliance_6_july_1990-en-9c5fa86b-12a0-4f59-ad90-e69503ef6036.html [In English].
- (n.d.) Declaration on Atlantic Relations issued by the North Atlantic Council «The Ottawa Declaration» (Brussels, 26 June 1974), https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/the_ottawa_declaration_19_june_1974-en-f346514e-080b-4053-a25d-abfd0e3d 4f26.html [In English].
- United States Department of State. (n.d.). Draft Tripartite Reply to Soviet Note of March 31, 1954, Approved by the Foreign Ministers of the United Kingdom, United States, and France, April 22, 1954. Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54v05p1/d262 [In English].
- Eisenhower, D. D. (n.d.). Annual message to the Congress on the State of the Union, 2 February 1953. The American Presidency Project., http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=9829 [In English].
- Eisenhower, D. D. (n.d.). The «Eisenhower Doctrine» on the Middle East, January 5, 1957. org. http://insidethecoldwar.org/sites/default/files/documents/Eisenhower%20Doctrine%20on%20the%20Middle%20East%20January%205%2C%201957.pdf [In English].
- Eisenhower, D. D. (n.d.). The Chance for Peace, April 16, 1953. org, https://www.libertarianism.org/essays/chance-peace [In English].
- Giauque,G. (2002). Grand designs and visions of unity: The Atlantic powers and the reorganization of Western Europe, 1955–1963. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press. [In English].
- Greene, R. (n.d.). Gerald Ford: Foreign affairs. University of Virginia, Miller Center, https://millercenter.org/president/ford/ foreign-affairs [In English].
- Hang, N. Th. (2015). US and European integration prior to 1968 / N. Th. Th.Hang. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 33(1), 83–109. [In English].
- Hill, Ch. & Smith, K. (2000). European foreign policy : Key documents. USA, Canada: Routledge. [In English].
- Holmes, J. (2015). The mood / interest theory of American foreign policy / J. E. Holmes. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. [In English].
- Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy, Washington, D., 20 January 1961. (n.d.). John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, https://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/Ready-Reference/JFK-Quotations/Inaugural-Address.aspx [In English].
- Johnson,B. (n.d.). Annual Message to the Congress on the State of the Union, 4 January 1965. The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu /ws/?pid=26907 [In English].
- Johnson, (1988/1989). Europe and the Reagan years. Foreign Affairs, 68(1), 28–38. [In English].
- Jones, B. (2008). Abolishing the Taboo: President Eisenhower and the Permissible use of nuclear weapons for national security (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan. [In English].
- Larres, (2009). A companion to Europe since 1945. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. [In English].
- Lay, J. S. (n.d.). A Report to the National Security Counsil by the Executive Secretary on Basic National Security Policy (Washington, 30 October 1953). The Federation of American Scientists, https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsc-hst/nsc-162-2.pdf [In English].
- Levy, C. & Roseman, M. (2001). Three postwar eras in comparison: Western Europe 1918–1945–1989. Berlin: Springer. [In English].
- Ludlow, P. (2013). The real years of Europe? : US-West European relations during the Ford administration. Journal of Cold War Studies, 15(3), 136-161. [In English].
- Lundestad (2005). The United States and Western Europe since 1945 : From «Empire» by invitation to transatlantic drift. Oxford University Press. [In English].
- Mahan, E. R. & Larsen J. A. (Eds). (2012). Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the era of massive retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953–1961. Cold War Foreign Policy Series. Special Study 3. Washington, D. C.: Historical Office of the Office of the Secretary of Defense. [In English].
- Oxenford, (2016). The evolution of US and European monetary policy after Bretton Woods: A historical overview and lessons for the future. London: Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. [In English].
- Paterson,G. (1989). Kennedy’s questfor victory: American foreign policy, 1961–1963. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [In English].
- Pauly, R. J. Jr. (2016). The Ashgate research companion to US foreign policy. London: Routledge. [In English].
- Public papers of the Presidents of the United States, Jimmy Carter, 1978 (In two books), Book II – June 30 to December 31, 1978. (1979). Washington D.С.: United States Government Printing Office. [In English].
- Reagan, (n.d.). Address to members of the British Parliament, 8 June 1982. The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=42614 [In English].
- Rusk, (n.d.). Telegram from the Department of State to the Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and European Regional Organizations, Washington, 30 December 1961. United States Department of State; Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/ frus1961-63v13/d122 [In English].
- Stone, & Otte, T.G. Anglo-French relations since the late eighteenth century. London: Routledge. [In English].
- European Union External Action. (n.d.). The New Transatlantic Agenda, http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/us/docs/ new_transatlantic_agenda_en.pdf [In English].