Volodymyr Holovchenko, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Institute of International Relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.


Based on the published documentary sources of Western origin, article spotlights the issue of Ukrainian question in the Cold War era US foreign strategies. It was found that at the state level is situationally raised only in political and ideological terms, mainly by members of Congress, but it lacks the expressive intentions and actions. This internal contradiction generated by disbelief in the possibility of the Soviet Union peaceful collapse, largely explains the lack of preparedness of US politicians to accept Ukraine as a great European power after the declaration of its independence. In their Soviet policy most US top leaders after 1917 took into account the inevitability of chaos is extremely undesirable and global destabilization as a consequence of the USSR disintegration.

National problems in the Soviet Union from practically political and not ideological point of view considered in the West mainly as an internal prerogative of official Moscow. Moreover, generally believed that attempts to break the status-quo in the territory of the USSR could cause irreparable damage to security interests of Western democracies, causing local or even global armed conflict.

It should also be noted that the Congress was probably better than the presidential administration prepared to understand the aspirations of freedom-loving Ukrainians. First, for many of congressmen support of ethnic communities has traditionally been important. Secondly, many members of Congress in 1970-80 participated in actions to protect human rights in Ukraine. The campaign united Liberal Democrats and hard anticommunists-Republicans, that relatively well focused on the internal political situation in the Ukrainian SSR, knew of many former political prisoners and most importantly – do not have stereotypes about these people that were sketched by propaganda from the Kremlin.

cold war, international relations, policy, Ukrainian question

Full text


  1. Deklaracija Prezidenta Obamy o nedele poraboshhennyh narodov. 2013, Jule 19. International information programs Publication [Online]. Avaliable from: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/russian/texttrans/2013/07/20130723279358.html?CP.rss=true№axzz3Peh9Gj7b.
  2. KAMINSKYI YE., DASHKEVYCH A. (1998) Polіtyka SShA shchodo Ukrainy: Vytoky, kontseptualnі osnovy, praktychna realіzacіia. Kyiv: Polіtychna dumka.
  3. KAMINSKYI YE.YE. (2012) Ukraina. SShA. Svіt. Vibrane. Kyiv: Tsentr vіlnoi presy.
  4. LENDIEL M. (1997) Formuvannia stratehіi SShA v «Ukrainskomu pytannі» (1939–1996 rr.). Polіtychna dumka, 4. p. 141-152.
  5. LENDIEL M. (1997) «Ukrainske pytannia» v polіtytsі SShA. Polіtyka і chas, 11. p. 67-74.
  6. PELENSKYI YA.Z. (1962) Ukrainska sprava u vzaemynakh mezhy SShA і SRSR pіd chas і pіslia Druhoi svіtovoi vіiny. Suchasnіst, 7(19). p. 71-84.
  7. RZHEVSKA N.F. (2012) Polіtychnyi analіz і stratehіchne prohnozuvannia v SShA: instytutsiinyi vimіr. Drohobych: Kolo.
  8. RYZHKOV M. M. (2006) «Grand Strategies». Amerykanskyi dosvіd stratehіchnoho planuvannia. Kyiv: Alkor.
  9. Svoboda. 1969, 28 October.
  10. Svoboda. 1976, 12-13 October.
  11. Svoboda. 1979, 18 January.
  12. SOSNOVSKYI M. (1966) Ukraina na mіzhnarodnіi arenі 1945–1965: problemi і perspektyvy Ukrainskoi zovnіshnoi polіtyky. Toronto, Ottava: Vydavnytstvo Doslіdnoho Іnstytutu Studіium.
  13. KORDAN B.S., LUCIUK L.Y. [compiled by], MACDONALD H.A. [foreward], (1987) Anglo-American Perspectives on the Ukrainian Question, 1938–1951: A Documentary Collection (Studies in East European Nationalisms). Kingston, Ont.; Vestal, N.Y.: Limestone Press.
  14. CHAPMAN O.L. (1952) The Spirit of Independence: America and Ukraine. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  15. DEVROY A., DOBBS M. (1991) Bush Warns Ukraine on Independence; President Supports Gorbachev’s Union Treaty in Kiev Speech. The Washington Post, August 2nd.
  16. DOBRIANSKY L.E. (1966) A U.S. Policy of Unfinished Liberation. Jersey City: Ukrainian Congress Committee of America.
  17. DOBRIANSKY L.E. (1990) The Captive Nations Week Resolution – Than and Now. The Ukrainian Quarterly. Vol. XLVI, № 4. p. 360-370.
  18. EISENHOWER D.E. (1957) Second Inaugural Address. New York Times, January 22nd.
  19. (1974) Foreign Relations of the United States. 1948. Volume ІV: Eastern Europe; The Soviet Union. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  20. KENNAN G.F. (1972) Memoirs, 1950–1963. Vol. II. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
  21. (1959) Public Law 86-90. Joint Resolution, providing for the designation of the third week of July as «Captive Nations Week» [Online]. Avaliable from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-73/pdf/STATUTE-73-Pg212.pdf.
  22. STETSKO Y. (1970) The Principles of Ukrainian Foreign Policy, International Situation and Liberation Struggle. London: Ukrainian Information Service.
  23. STEVENSON A. (1961) Letter on Colonialism. U.S. Delegation to the GA, November 25th.
  24. The Case of the Captive Nations. The Ukrainian Quarterly (1990) Vol. XLVI, 2. p. 127-130.

DOI http://doi.org/10.17721/2521-1706.2016.01.40-49