DOI 10.17721/2521-1706.2023.15.1

Iryna Dudko,

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Educational and Scientific Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID logo 

Vladyslav Faraponov,

Analyst at Internews Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
ORCID logo 

Abstract. The purpose of this article is to analyze the United States’ support to Ukraine during the war with Russia, as well as in the months leading up to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. This issue remains relevant to conceptualizing US assistance to Ukraine to expel Russian forces from its territory. In particular, we claim that among other policy alternatives, the Biden administration deliberately chose to support Ukraine «for as long as it takes». Thus, we analyze the amount and comprehensiveness of support to Ukraine, which we consider to be in Washington’s core interests, as well as US efforts in terms of policy-making.

The methodological design of the study is based on discourse analysis as a major method, which allowed us to examine the policy choice of the Biden administration to provide massive and comprehensive support to Ukraine in a critical time of need. When describing US assistance, we apply historical institutionalism and rational choice institutionalism as the major theoretical paradigms, as there are features of both used by the United States in its bilateral relations with Ukraine. We operate within a confirmatory research design, where the major method is hypothesis testing.

The scientific novelty consists of an attempt to conceptualize the so-called Biden doctrine in the context of American assistance to Ukraine in order to sustain it in the war against Russia. We test our hypothesis on three major dimensions: the President’s authority, Congress and the U.S. leadership of NATO, and the Defense Contact Group.

The authors conclude that the amount of US support to Ukraine and its comprehensiveness, particularly economic and military aid, indicate that the Biden administration viewed Ukraine as a test of its vision of foreign policy, namely that democracies should prevail over autocracies. Therefore, the unprecedented amount of aid allocated to Ukraine suggests that the support will last as long as it takes.

Key words: United States, American-Ukrainian relations, American foreign policy, U.S. assistance for Ukraine, Joe Biden’s doctrine.

Submitted 29.03.2023


1. Bartels, L. (1991). Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup. American Political Science Review, 85 (2), 457–474. [In English].
2. Time. (2023, January 10). Biden Deepens Involvement in War by Inviting Ukrainian Troops to U.S. for Weapons Training. [In English].
3. Bolton, J. (2023, March 15). Why Won’t the West Let Ukraine Win Against Russia? The Wall Street Journal. [In English].
4. Brzeziński, Z. (2012) Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. New York: Basic Books. [In English].
5. Brzezinski, Z. (1994). The Premature Partnership. Foreign Affairs, 73 (2), 67–82. [In English].
6. Burton, C., & Qamar, Z. (2023, January 13). How Americans’ Support For Aiding Ukraine Has Evolved. FiveThirtyEight. [In English].
7. Charap, S. & Colton, T. J. (2017). Everyone Loses: The Ukraine Crisis and the Ruinous Contest for Post-Soviet Eurasia. London: Routledge. [In English]
8. Committee for a responsible budget. (2023, January 5). Congress Approved $113 Billion of Aid to Ukraine in 2022. [In English].
9. Congressional Research Service. (2023, February 13). Department of Defense Supplemental Funding for Ukraine: A Summary. [In English].
10. Congressional Research Service. (2022, January 10). Foreign Assistance: An Introduction to U.S. Programs and Policy. [In English].
11. Congressional Research Service. (2023, February 27). U.S. Security Assistance to Ukraine (Report No. IF12040). [In English].
12. Foreign Аassistance. (2023, January 1). U.S. foreign assistance data. [In English].
13. Hattori, T. (2003). The Moral Politics of Foreign Aid. Review of International Studies, 29 (2), 229–247. [In English].
14. Herbst, J., Taylor, W. & Kramer, D. J. (2023, February 24). Give Ukraine What It Wants. Foreign Affairs. [In English].
15. Hobson, J. (2000). The State and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [In English].
16. House Armed Services Committee. (2023, February 28). Statement for the Record House Armed Services Committee Dr. Colin Kahl, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy. [In English].
17. Linz, Juan J., & Alfred C. Stepan. (1996). Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7 (2), 14–33. [In English].
18. Kagan, R. (2022, December 20). A Free World, If You Can Keep It. Foreign Affairs. [In English].
19. Kuzio, T. & D’Anieri, P. (2018, June 16). The Causes and Consequences of Russia’s Actions towards Ukraine. E-International Relations. [In English].
20. Martin, P., & Jacobs, J. (2022, June 3). Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine Forces Biden to Rewrite U.S. Security Plan. Bloomberg. [In English].
21. The White House. (2015). National Security Strategy. [In English].
22. The White House. (2017). National Security Strategy. [In English].
23. The White House. (2022). National Security Strategy. [In English].
24. New York Times (2022, September 29). Pentagon Establishes Special Command to Aid Ukraine. [In English].
25. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2001). Library of Congress. [In English].
26. U.S. Department of Defense. (2023, March 15). Opening Remarks by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III at the Tenth Ukraine Defense Contact Group. [In English].
27. Picula, B. & Luša, D. (2022). The Biden Doctrine and the War in Ukraine: Renewed Transatlantic Relations or Reatlantisation Between a Strategic and a Situational Partnership? Teorija in Praksa, 59 (4), 969–1027. [In English].
28. Sharp, T. (2019). Wars, presidents, and punctuated equilibriums in US defense spending. Policy Sciences, 52, 367–396. [In English].
29. Schweller, R. L. (1996, March). Neorealism’s status-quo bias: What security dilemma. Security Studies, 5 (3), 90–121. [In English].
30. Shannon, A. C. & Bernstein, J. L. (2022). Vital Statistics on American Politics 2017–2020. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press Sage Knowledge. [In English].
31. Shapiro, R. Y. (2011). Public opinion and American democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75 (5), 987–1015. [In English].
32. Toal, G. (2017) Near Abroad: Putin, the West, and the Contest Over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [In English].
33. Kiel Institute for the World Economy. (2023). Ukraine Support Tracker. [In English].
34. Trade.Data.Pro. (2023). Ukraine Trade Data. [In English].
35. U.S. Department of State. (2023). U.S. Security Cooperation with Ukraine. [In English].
36. U.S. Government. (2023, January). Joint Strategic Oversight Plan for Ukraine Response. [In English].
37. Werner, J. (2021, July 9). Does America Really Support Democracy – or Just Other Rich Democracies? Foreign Affairs. [In English].
38. Windman, A. & Bustillios, D. (2022, March 6). America Must Do More to Help Ukraine Fight Russia. Foreign Affairs. [In English].
39. Yarysh, O. (2023, March 23). Ukrainian Patriot Air Defense Crew Finishes Training Ahead of Schedule. Voice of America. [In English].
40. Yellen, J. L. (2023, February 28). Economic Aid to Ukraine Is Vital. The New York Times. [In English].
41. Younis, M. (2023, February 6). One Year Later, Americans Still Stand by Ukraine. Gallup. [In English].
42. New York Times. (2023, January 30). Zelensky Implores Allies to Speed Up Weapons Deliveries. [In English].
43. Zielinski, R. C., Fordham, B. O., & Schilde, K. E. (2017). What goes up, must come down? The asymmetric effects of economic growth and international threat on military spending. Journal of Peace Research, 54 (6), 791–805. [In English].
44. Zimmerman, W. (1998). Is Ukraine a Political Community? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31 (1), 43–55. [In English].