UKRAINIAN NATIONAL ISSUE IN THE EMERGING U.S. STRATEGY TOWARDS THE SOVIET UNION (1946 – 1953)

DOI 10.17721/2521-1706.2023.16.3

Nataliya Gorodnia

Dr. habil. (History), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-3927

Abstract. The purpose of the article is to reveal the consideration of the Ukrainian national issue in designing and implementing the U.S. postwar strategy towards the Soviet Union at the outbreak of the Cold War, under the presidency of Harry Truman.

Methodology. This is qualitative empirical research, based on a critical analysis of primary and secondary sources. The research topic is studied against the background of developments of the international situation after World War II, which influenced the shaping of the U.S. post-war strategy towards the USSR, as well as the development of anti-Soviet armed resistance in the western part of Ukraine, and Ukrainian Americans’ efforts to use the new international situation in Ukrainian national interests.

The scientific novelty of the research consists in the coverage of a topic that has not been sufficiently studied, and in the introduction of new primary sources for this purpose.

Conclusions. The postwar U.S. foreign policy strategy was driven by Soviet expansionism, and a threat of a new world war. The American Government began to consider the Ukrainian national issue in designing the post-war strategy towards the USSR because of three major factors: the heroic struggle of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) in the western part of Ukraine; the willingness of the representatives of Ukrainian political émigré with close ties to the UPA to cooperate with the U.S. intelligence, and the activities of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, aimed at obtaining American Government’s assistance and support for Ukrainians in Europe.

In 1946–1951, the representatives of some Ukrainian émigré groups were involved in gathering intelligence about Soviet military capabilities and intentions, and in operations to root out Soviet agents among Displaced Persons in Germany. In 1949–1951, the CIA parachuted the Ukrainian couriers, trained as wireless operators, into the western part of Ukraine to collect intelligence and to organize a network of active resistance behind the Soviet lines in case of the new world war. U.S. intelligence cooperated mostly with the most moderate group of Ukrainian political émigré – the Foreign Representation of the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council. After this strategy had failed, the U.S. Government focused on the development of a psychological warfare strategy. One of the components of its implementation was the foundation of Prolog Research and Publishing Association (1952) with CIA assistance. However, the understanding of the importance of the Ukrainian national factor in the U.S. «Soviet» strategy was only emerging.

Key words: United States, USSR, Ukraine, Ukrainian factor, U.S. foreign policy strategy, Cold War, Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, «Voice of America».

Submitted: 27.05.2023

Download 

References:

  1. Vedeneev, D. & Lysenko, О. (2009). The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and Foreign Intelligence Services (1920s–1950s). Ukrainian Historical Journal, 3, 132–146. [In Ukrainian].
  2. Gorodnia, N. (2023). Did the U.S. Strategy of the 1970s and 1980s Envisage the Disintegration of the USSR? In N. Gorodnia (Ed.), Proceedings of the academic conference «USA: politics, society, culture – 2023» (рр. 115–123). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://surl.li/mvqnb. [In Ukrainian].
  3. Kaminsky, А. (1982). Land, Emigration and International Backstage. Manchester – Munich – New York: Publication of the Political Council of the OUN(z). [In Ukrainian].
  4. Kaminsky, А. (1999). Vasyl Okhrymovych. A Biographical Sketch. Toronto – New York – London: Political Council of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists Abroad and the UHVR. [In Ukrainian].
  5. Kaminsky, А. (2009). «Prolog» in the Cold War against Moscow (Continuation of the Liberation Struggle from Abroad). Hadiach: Publishing house «Hadiach». [In Ukrainian].
  6. Lendiel, М. (1998). Participation of American Ukrainians in the Government and Political Structures of the United States (1945–1991). Ukrainian Historical Journal, 4, 81–90. [In Ukrainian].
  7. Ponypalyak, O. (2022). Cooperation of the OUN with the USA and Great Britain in 1945–1955 (based on Soviet materials). Ethnic history of the peoples of Europe, 67, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.17721/2518-1270.2022.67.11. [In Ukrainian].
  8. Panchenko, О. (2020, January 29). «Prolog», «Svoboda», «Sychastist» і «Frentik» in the Life and Activity of a Journalist Rostyslav Homiak. Chas i Podii, (2020(5)). https://www.chasipodii.net/article/24133. [In Ukrainian].
  9. A Report to the National Security Council by the Executive Secretary on U.S. Objectives and Programs for National Security. (1950, April 14). Public Intelligence. http://surl.li/njewu. [In English].
  10. An Open Letter to the Directorate of the «Voice of America» with regard to Ukrainian Language Broadcasts, 1950. (n.d.). FOIA Electronic Reading Room. http://surl.li/nhjke. [In English].
  11. Cull, N. (2008). The Cold War and the United States Information Agency. American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy, 1945–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press. [In English].
  12. Development of Intelligence on USSR. Memorandum by the Director of Central Intelligence (Souers). CIG 8. Washington, April 29, 1946. (n.d.). Office of the Historian. http://surl.li/nijgi. [In English].
  13. Issues of Conflict between the Soviet Bloc and the West, March 2, 1952. (n.d.). FOIA Electronic Reading Room. http://surl.li/nijgl. [In English].
  14. Johnson, A. (2010). Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. The CIA Years and Beyond. Washington – Stanford: W. Wilson International Press and Stanford University Press. [In English].
  15. Kennan, G. F. (1947). The Sources of Soviet Conduct. Foreign Affairs, 25 (4), 566–582. [In English].
  16. Kuzio, T. (2012). U.S. Support for Ukraine’s Liberation During the Cold War: A Study of Prolog Research and Publishing Corporation. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45 (1), 51–64. [In English]
  17. Memorandum from the Assistant Director for Policy Coordination (Wisner) to Director of Central Intelligence Hillenkoetter. Washington, October 29, 1948. OPC Projects. (n.d.). Office of the Historian. http://surl.li/nijhr. [In English].
  18. National Security Council Directive on Office of Special Projects. NSC 10/2. Washington, June 18, 1948. (n.d.). Office of the Historian. http://surl.li/nijhw. [In English].
  19. Powers, Th. (n.d.). The Man Who Kept the Secrets. Internet Archive. http://surl.li/nijih. [In English].
  20. Psychological Warfare. Report by an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the State–Army–Navy–Air Force Coordinating Committee. Washington, November 7, 1947. SANACC 304/11. (n.d.). Office of the Historian. http://surl.li/nijit. [In English].
  21. Ref Book – 1947 National Security Act. (n.d.). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. http://surl.li/hcddy. [In English].
  22. Research Aid: Cryptonyms and Terms in Declassified CIA Files Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Records Disclosure Acts, 200. (n.d.). National Archives. http://surl.li/nijjb. [In English].
  23. Rositzke, H. (1975). America’s Secret Operations: A Perspective. Foreign Affairs, 53(2), 334–351. [In English].
  24. Rudling, A. P. (2018). «Not Quite Klaus Barbie, but in that Category»: Mykola Lebed, the CIA, and the Airbrushing of the Past. Іn Norman Goda (Ed.), Rethinking Holocaust Justice: Essays across Disciplines (pp. 158–187). New York – Oxford: Berghahn Books. [In English].
  25. Karmazyn, O. Mashevskyi & O. Sukhobokova. (Eds.) (2020). Sharing America’s Story with Ukraine: The Voice of America’s Ukrainian Service, 1949–2019 – a collection of articles and essays in commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the Ukrainian Service of the Voice of America. http://uaas.org.ua/members_works.html. [In English & Ukrainian].
  26. Sukhobokova, O. (2020). «We Shall Tell You the Thuth»: «Voice of America» in the Global Information Space (1940-ies – beginning of the XXI century). Intermarum: history, policy, culture, 7, 136–153. https://doi.org/10.33287/112008. [In English].
  27. Tensions within the Soviet Union, prepared at the request of Senator Alexander Wiley by the Legislative References Service of the Library of Congress. Presented by Mr. Wiley, 1951, May 24. (n.d.). The Library of Congress. http://surl.li/nhjqv. [In English].
  28. The Non-Russian Nations in the USSR. Focal Point in the American Policy of National Liberation. Address by Dr. Leo E. Dobriansky, 1952, May 15. (n.d.). Diasporiana.org.ua. http://surl.li/nhjsc. [In English].
  29. The Story of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (1940–1951). (n.d.). Ukrainian Congress Committee of America. http://surl.li/nhjst. [In English].
  30. S. Objectives with Respect to Russia. Report to the National Security Council by the Department of State: Summary of Conclusions. NSC 20/1. Washington, August 18, 1948. (n.d.). Office of the Historian. http://surl.li/nijjh. [In English].